|
qkg:contextText
|
The communist peasant-nationalist regimes of Asia, relying on the Führerprinzip, extreme ethnocentric nationalism, and racism (and the ultimately grotesque in antimodernism in the case of the Cambodia of the Khmer Rouge) seem to some to represent the fascistization of communism. There is no doubt that, as discussed earlier, fascism and communism share many fundamental characteristics, and Russian spokesmen delight in applying the same words to China as to Nazi Germany: ‘petit bourgeois’ policy, ‘bourgeois nationalism’, ‘military-bureaucratic degeneration’, ‘subservient obedience’ of the masses, ‘anti-intellectualism’, ‘voluntarism’, ‘subjectivism’, ‘autarchic’ policies that try to place ‘surplus population’ on ‘foreign territories’, concluding that ‘the Maoist approach in no way differs from fascism’. — p. 208-209 (pt) |
