Mention163508

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text ...he once-accepted assumption that Spinoza was considered a “dead dog” in Kant's day is no longer tenable. Suffice it here to recall the well-known fact that Spinoza is the subject of the single longest entry in Bayle's Dictionnaire . It is true that Bayle attempts to refute Spinoza but unlikely that so much space would be dedicated to refuting a neglected philosopher—unlikely, indeed, that Spinoza's relevance would wane once this high-profile entry had been published about him. J. Zedler's Grosses Universal Lexikon gives a similar impression, devoting to Spinoza a five-page discussion. Descartes, by comparison, is discussed in one page. Hume, Locke, Hobbes, and Plato are equally dealt with in one page each. D. Diderot and J. d'Alembert's Encyclopédie similarly dedicates to Spinoza five times more space than to most relevant thinkers in the history of philosophy. While speaking of Spinoza's metaphysics in extremely hostile terms, the Encyclopédie gives a reliable account of the Ethics definitions and axioms and discusses at length its most important demonstrations, especially E1p1–11. The Dictionnaire, the Lexikon, and the Encyclopédie were the main transmitters of Enlightenment thought. The attention they devoted to Spinoza ensured him a place at the heart of Enlightenment debate. It would be impossible for any educated reader to avoid contact with Spinoza's ideas. It would be easy for every metaphysician to get a grasp on the system of the Ethics. And it would be tempting, for every philosophically inclined thinker, to read Spinoza for themselves. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Baruch_Spinoza
so:description Quotations regarding Spinoza (en)
so:description A - F (en)
qkg:hasContext qkg:Context80207
Property Object

Triples where Mention163508 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation153466 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property