Mention184045

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text The deeper question that lies behind the above banalities is whether the rules of baseball are similar to or radically different from the rules of science. Clearly they are radically different. Like the rules of chess and bridge, the rules of baseball or made by humans. But the rules of science are not. They are discovered by observation, reasoning, and experiment. Newton didn’t invent his laws of gravity except in the obvious sense that he thought of them and wrote them down. Biologists didn’t “construct” the DNA helix; they observed it. The orbit of Mars is not a social construction. Einstein did not make up E=mc2 the way game rules are made up. To see rules of science as similar to baseball rules, traffic rules, or fashions in dress is to make a false analogy that leads nowhere. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Gardner
so:description Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience (2001) (en)
qkg:hasContext qkg:Context90408
Property Object

Triples where Mention184045 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation172983 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property