Mention244963

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text The original intent of the 14th Amendment, and of the Congress and the American people who ratified it, can best be understood in the light of the change it effected in antecedent constitutional law. Taney's opinion in Dred Scott was still in effect as the Civil War came to an end. By it Negroes, whether free or slave, could not be citizens of the United States. Although the 13th Amendment abolished slavery, it did not settle the question of Negro citizenship. This was however decided by the opening sentence of the 14th Amendment. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The intent of this sentence could however be frustrated if it were possible to make distinctions within citizenship, by which some citizens would have more rights, and others less. It was to prevent this that the Amendment went on to declare that "No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Harry_V._Jaffa
so:description The Logic of the Colorblind Constitution (2004) (en)
so:description 2000s (en)
Property Object

Triples where Mention244963 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation230720 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property