Mention355646

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text Suppose, however, there is not enough time for measures to be taken to prevent a collision, and earth is shattered by a giant NEO that will hurt us all into oblivion. What are the philosophical implications of such an event? This obviously is not a problem for atheists, agnostics, or pantheists because they are resigned to the fact that nature does not care a rap about preserving a species. What about theists? I’m inclined to think that even to them a certain extinction of humanity would be acceptable. The Biblical Jehovah, remember, is said to have drowned every man, woman, baby, and their pets, except for Noah and his family. If God can allow an earthquake to kill thousands, or the Black Death to wipe out half of Europe, surely she would have no scruples about allowing an asteroid to bring human history to a flaming end. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Gardner
so:description Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience (2001) (en)
qkg:hasContext qkg:Context175116
Property Object

Triples where Mention355646 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation336115 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property