Mention501685

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text The original 1954 Japanese film, Gojira was iconic, and only made a couple mistakes of any significance. They killed him in the end, and we saw his body turned to skeleton. Not the best way to begin 60 years worth of sequels. Godzilla was depicted as a dinosaur, and was associated with living trilobites. Even if there was some sort of ‘realm that time forgot’ out in the Pacific somewhere, Trilobites were already extinct before the first dinosaurs, and Godzilla was clearly no dinosaur. The conceptual artists reportedly referenced illustrations of dinosaurs, but that’s not what they rendered. All bi-pedal dinosaurs were digigrade, walking on their toes, like birds, and usually only three or four digits. Godzilla was plantigrade and pentadactyle, just like lizards. It even looks like a lizard, apart from the fact that no reptile has an actual nose or external ears. In a sense, what Toho pictures created was actually an oriental dragon. These tend to mix reptilian and mammalian traits. Amusingly in 1954, Toho made a giant lizard and called it a dinosaur. In 1998, Tristar re-designed Godzilla as a dinosaur, but called it a lizard. Of course that wasn’t the only thing Tristar did wrong. They tried to ruin the monster completely. They took away the only thing that worked in decades of sequels, the look of the monster itself. Then they took away everything that made Godzilla appealing to Kaiju fans, then they tied it down and shot it. Such disrespect. If you’re going to make a movie that already has a fan-base, and they are the ones who will decide whether your film will pay off, respect those fans and the story they’re paying to see. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Aron_Ra
so:description Weighing in on Godzilla (June 8, 2014) (en)
so:description Patheos (en)
Property Object

Triples where Mention501685 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation475498 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property