Mention542959

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text The insurance companies see this legislation as a tax. My question is: why is that unreasonable, particularly when the insurance companies would save so much money in the long run. Research will keep the American people healthier, resulting in fewer insurance claims. We tax oil companies and use the money to build and maintain highways. In New York state, if you win the lottery, you pay a significant tax which goes to a state fund for education. Most states have sales taxes which are a major source of revenue for a wide variety of programs and services that benefit the public. Why shouldn't insurance companies be asked to help solve the health care crisis in this country? Because of the advances to date, we can save millions of lives. Our challenge for the future is not just improving the quality of life of those we save, but finding the cures to prevent that suf-fering in the first place. Our scientists are on the threshold of major breakthroughs in almost every disease or condition that now cause so much hardship for people across the country and around the world. The insurance companies owe it to our families and our society to make a small sacrifice which can do so much good. I hope that this excellent piece of legislation which already has tremendous grassroots support will be enacted during this legislative session. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Christopher_Reeve
so:description “Christopher Reeve Testimony on National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding”, (June 5, 1997) (en)
Property Object

Triples where Mention542959 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation514642 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property