Mention612132

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text Demanding an “ape-man” is actually just as silly as asking to see a mammal-man, or a half-human, half-vertebrate. How about a half dachshund, half dog? It’s the same thing. One may as well insist on seeing a town half way between Los Angeles and California. Because the problem with bridging the gap between humans and apes is that there is no gap because humans are apes –definitely and definitively. The word, “ape” doesn’t refer to a species, but to a parent category of collective species, and we’re included. This is no arbitrary classification like the creationists use. It was first determined via meticulous physical analysis by Christian scientists a century before Darwin, and has been confirmed in recent years with new revelations in genetics. Furthermore, it is impossible to define all the characters exclusively indicative of every known member of the family of apes without describing our own genera as one among them. Consequently, we can and have proven that humans are apes in exactly the same way that lions are cats, and iguanas are lizards, and whales are mammals. So where is the proof that humans descend from apes? How about the fact that we’re still apes right now! (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Aron_Ra
so:description Youtube (en)
so:description Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism (en)
qkg:hasContext qkg:Context301376
Property Object

Triples where Mention612132 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation580321 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property