Mention733536

Download triples
rdf:type qkg:Mention
so:text Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the — like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate — the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those — if that growth is affected, it will help on the red. (en)
so:isPartOf https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
so:description 2005 (en)
so:description 2000s (en)
Property Object

Triples where Mention733536 is the object (without rdf:type)

qkg:Quotation695733 qkg:hasMention
Subject Property